Public Policing Versus Private Security

humanity Policing Versus cliquish protective cover Kayla Cook CJA/500 November 8, 2009 Mrs. Jancie graham Abstract Public policing and reclusive credentials score several(prenominal) clear-cut differences. Public policing is the ability to enforce the law and maintain tell in society. Private securities atomic number 18 paid agencies that perform the protective and loss-prevention duties non traveling bagd by police officers. Yet human beings policing and close pledge strains the same go and duties. These services and duties ar performed to achieve somewhat of the same goals. Both answer as leaders in their line of imprint.The leadership wants are set by devil different standards. They both share a overconfident relationship with the criminal evaluator dodge. This relationship could be enhanced if the two would league with wiz an other. This could help them combine their essential policies for the current place they perform now. Public policing and pri vy security leave behind continue to put forward and officiate unitedly in the future. This paper will also guide and discuss the importance of a comprehensive security plan, and its key components. The Differences among Public Policing and Private warrantorPublic policing is the ability to enforce the law and maintain order in society. Private securities are paid agencies that perform the protective and loss-prevention duties not handled by police officers. Public policing and snobby security puzzle several distinct differences. Public policing does the following 1) maintain order, 2) performs community service, 3) detect crime, 4) handle crime, and 5) prevent crime, 6) traffic control, 7) stop and question an individual, 8) search individuals and their personal belongings, 9) make do interrogations, and 10) arrest an individual.Private security does the following paid duties 1) serves as an escort, 2) patrol admit and business areas, 3) serves as guards at gates, 4) tra nsport valuables, 5) security training, 6) screening of military group for employment, 7) technical counter surveillance, 8) security consultation, 9) install alarm systems and 10)offer private security vaults (Reid, 1996). The Similarities between Public Policing and Private Security Public policing and private security offers some of the same services and duties. These services and duties are performed to achieve some of the same goals.In this way they are able to assist each other in performing these services and duties. Public policing and private security offer the following services and duties 1) crime prevention, 2) crime control, 3) assist is emergencies, 4) training, 5) conduct searches, 6) confused in community events, 7) offer security, 8) monitor specific area, 9) proffers protection, and 10) they both tolerate legal powers. Both public policing and private security agencies are held responsible for their actions. Neither escapes criticisms from outside sources.Our society needs the services and duties that both stomach to help ensure the safety of our freedom and our property (Walker, & Katz, 2011). The Differences between Public Policing and Private Security Leadership Roles The difference between public policing and private security leadership roles are the standard requirements for leadership. The requirement for leadership in public policing is regulated by the government and civil service. The only requirement for leadership in private security is to lead by example. This is because private security agencies are privately subscribe and they do not have a set required standard.The Relationship of Public Policing and Private Security with the Criminal Justice System The relationship of public policing with the criminal justice system is to prevent crime and provide justice to the public. The relationship of private security with the criminal justice system is to prevent crime and provide justice to its employees. They both share the sa me relationship with the criminal justice system. The relationship would be work more effective if law enforcement officers and private security agencies would work together along with the criminal justice system to prevent crime and provide justice to the public and private employees.The inborn Policies for Public Policing and Private Security Public policing and private security have several distinct differences in their essential policies. The essential policies for public policing are 1) Hierarchical- there are many different official and formal levels of public agencies positions. 2) Civil service- civil service examinations are given to chose only the almost qualified personnel based on merit. 3) Apolitical- the government gives the policies to public policing to execute. 4) honest and fair- the treatment of all citizen using government services are to be fair and just. ) Public affairs-oriented- focus is given to the management of public agencies and organizations. 6) Publ ic-service oriented- reach is not a motive the serve the public. 7) Publicly lineageed- tax revenues fund these public administrations. 8) Publicly documented- all citizens can review administrative records and financial documents. 9) Accountable to the public- at anytime legislative and judicial review can be done to public administration. The essential policies for private security are 1) Private enterprise- goal is to complete a private obligation instead of a public one. ) Private or corporate ownership- private organizations are owned by private individuals, groups, or stockholders. 3) Competitiveness- the organization may be in competition with another organization with the same product or service. 4) salary incentive- normally the incentive is to generate net profit unless it is a not-for-profit private organization. 5) Financing regulated by market price- the ability to manage the product or service is based on revenue. 6) Privacy of culture and records- limited inform ation is proprietary and the property of the owners. ) Accountability to owners and stockholders- instead of be accountable to the public, the organization and its employees are held accountable to the organizations owners. 8) any(prenominal) freedom in selection and termination of employees- civil service rules do not regulate the organization ability to hire or kindle employees. 9) Freedom to regulate work methods and organization- the organization is not regulated by civil service rules (Ortmeier, 2009). The importance of a Comprehensive Security final cause and Its Key Components The security plan must(prenominal) also specify the persons who have access to security areas, and it must specify the various components necessary for sensible security, such as barriers, lighting, alarm systems, fire protection systems, locks, and communications. It must breaker point full instructions for the guard force. These instructions must contain both general orders applicable to all g uards and special orders pertaining to specific posts, patrols, and areas. There must be provision for emergency situations. Specific plans for fire, flood, storm, or power mishap should be part of the overall plan of action.You should also specify nation to call in an emergency. After the security plan has been formulated and implemented, it must be reexamined periodically for flaws and for ways to improve it and keep it current with brisk needs. Circulation of the plan should be limited and controlled. It must be remembered that such a plan, however well conceived, is doomed from the outset unless it is constantly and carefully administrate (Fisher, Halibozek, & Green, 2008, 36 Conclusion Public policing and private security are study components in the criminal justice system.The mere existence of both public policing and private security helps our communities feel safe. Once the two merge and work together, more problems can be solved to prevent crimes. This partnership will be form when the importance of each others responsibilities and roles are identified. Law enforcement agencies are slowly coming to realize the benefits of a partnership with private security can be since 9/11. This was just one of the many examples of how effectively public policing and private security can work together.In the future, public policing and private security will continue to work together to prevent crime and provide justice to all. References Fisher, R. J. , Halibozek, E. , & Green, G. (2008). Introduction to Security (8th ed. ). Burlington, MA Butterworth-Heinemann. Katz, C. M. & Walker, S. (2011). The Police in America An Introduction (7th ed. ). New York, NY McGraw-Hill Ortmeier, P. J. (2008). Introduction to Security operations and Management (3rd ed. ). Upper Saddle River, NJ Pearson/Prentice Hall. Reid, carry through (1996). Criminal Justice (4th ed. ). Madison, WI. Brown & Benchmark.