The American Civil War was Avoidable Essay -- American History

The American gracious state of war was AvoidableThe explosion of the American Civil fight was caused by a vast number of conflicting principles and prejudices, fueled by sectional differences, and even up afire by a very unfortunate set of policy-making events. Undoubtedly, the central theme of almost all of the events that led up to the Civil state of war was one way or another, related to the junk of slavery. Throughout the nineteenth century, slavery-related tensions brewed to such an extent, that politicians often took accustom to suspending the hot base altogether, because they were too scared of either starting a big political feud, or losing votes from one side of the issue or the other. More specifically, threesome events that were most instrumental in bringing about the Civil War were the Kansas-northeastward Act of 1854 and the Presidential election of 1860. Because of such strong reactions to these events, the Civil War was practically unstoppable, however if th e parties wanted to avoid a war altogether, they could pass advocated more compromise and popular sovereignty.As previously mentioned, slavery was at the root of most tensions that arose between the North and the South, and the annexation of new acres created much conflict concerning the status of slavery. Missouri Compromise dictated that the lands of the atomic number 57 Purchase north of the 3630 parallel were to be light of slavery. Democratic senator Douglas, introduced a bill in early 1854 which proposed the division of the Nebraska Territory into two units, Kansas and Nebraska, and the application of his idea of popular sovereignty which would earmark the territorial vote to decide the areas status concerning slavery. This intent would, in effect, repeal the Missouri Compromise, which greatly angered abolitionists and Northerners. Douglas and Southern supporters win a congressional debate and shortly afterwards, the bill was signed. With the passage of this bill, many an(prenominal) conflicts arose. Much personal turmoil erupted in the territories with almost immediate tragical results in Bleeding Kansas. Also, the bill resulted in a complete realignment of the major political parties The Democrats lost influence in the North and were to become the regional proslavery party of the South, the Whig Party, which had opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, died in the South and was weakened in the North, and a new Republican Party ... ...ecause of so many sectional differences, each(prenominal) region of America had its own intended President, creating a situation in which the losers of the election would already be organized for revolt. However, given that the parties were what they were, President capital of Nebraska could have proposed a quick but strong compromise, right after he won the election, which would keep the Southerners and other non-supporters satisfied with the new political situation. Unfortunately, slavery-issues had been brewing for far too long for this situation to have an delicate way out. The American Civil War was caused by an explosion of conflictions, elicit by regional and sectional differences and an unfortunate sequence of political events. As explained earlier, the central theme of almost all of the events that brought about the Civil War was related to slavery. The Kansas-Nebraska Act, the Dred Scott Case, and the Election of 1860 were three events that played very instrumental roles in causing the Civil War, however each could have been handled differently by the parties involved. The approaches of the parties could have been more subtle, using compromises to settle disputes, in order to avoid a war.