Debate About K to 12 Essay

Debate Ab come out of the closet K 12JOEL exhaustively morning/Good afternoon as the case maybe The subdivision of Education is shortly facing the issue about DepEd inn No. 32, series of 2012 (former(a)wise cognise as the implementing rules and regulations of Republic Act No. 10157 or the Kindergarten Education Act) and DepEd Order No. 31, series of 2012 (policy guidelines on the implementation of Grades 1 to 10 of the K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum). These curricula atomic number 18 bombarded with a lot of doubt and doubts, non being part of the Department implicated with the implementation of these computer weapons platforms.The Department of Educations planned shift to K+12 seeks to stir the accepted curriculum and on the wholeow high train graduates to specialize and be equipped with skills to enter industry, a vocation or engage in entrepreneurial activity. Though reforms meet been discussed since the Unesco Mission survey in 1949, it is only now that defi nite action on K+12 is being taken to move our education system up to international standards. merely this does non end here. The move to K+12 is a procrastinating process that willing command the time and commitment of all stakeholders, peculiarly p atomic number 18nts and teachers, because this kind of reform is not focused on star world alone but involves cohesive action from all sectors to address the involve of their communities.According to some studies and researchers, 10 long time of studying is not adequate for us to be that ready. That equipped to slope all the challenges in life. We argon living in this ever changing world, the reason why we need to be always ready, to be always at our best to face those changes, for us to be fully armed in the time of battle the battle of the brain, the real battle of life. yet is there authentically a need to add 2 much years just to draw in us ready and that knowledgeable enough? Is an redundant of 2 to a greater e xtent years in education really satisfies the need of Filipino citizenry? We be aw ar that many Filipino suffered and belt up suffering from hunger, malnutrition, maltreatment, unemployment and many more than than. Many atomic number 18 suffering from being uneducated and maybe it is received K 12 is a great tending. But the question is deal we afford it? There are many out of naturalise spring chicken immediately because of poverty.Because their parents had no means of living, those who are calledas isang kahig, isang tuka. The money they suck in is just enough for the food and it is too tough for them to go to school and spend their 10 years of life in studying. Because for them what matter to the highest degree is that they have food to eat. So they choose to work rather than studying. In fact 10 years of studying is really sp destination a lot of money and another(prenominal) 2 years, more money again. Also, students break it boring and feel like studying is a never ending journey. Additional years in education system will really require more budgets not just from the government but from the parents as well. Aside from that, students will need extra classrooms, school supplies, plan and more qualified teachers as well.CHAWEE Weve heard the argument on the powerfulness of K+12 if the students dont even have tables to work on, or laughingstockt even get to school because of brusk infrastructure. These are programs that the private sector, through civil society, is actively working on with the help of the government. Local government units have a large role in making sure that the educational need of their communities are met. The Synergia Foundation has been effective in working with LGUs to improve their communities.ESPLENIA Are we ready for E-Learning? Maybe yes, or maybe no, but if we dont prepare for it now we will never be. The technology and the infrastructure have been introduced to the public schools through Gilas, a public-p rivate sector curtain raising that has been at the forefront of providing computers and Internet connectivity to public schools nationwide. through and through Gilas many teachers and students have been trained on the use of technology for learning. An eLearning program called Genyo has proven an effective tool for public school teachers and students. The software is shortly being used in private schools and has been donated to public schools through Gilas and the initiative of private foundations.Manuel Boy Mejorada saysNovember 12, 2010 at 957 amJOEL I must add that the K-12 revised curriculum isnt the cure-all etymon for our educational woes. Huge investments need to be made on alter the education infrastructure classrooms, textbooks, learning aids, teachertraining at all levels. Adding the dickens years will not repair the defect if the foundations of a childs education are weak in the initiatory place. The problem about the present curriculum in squeezing 12 years of pr efatory education into just 10 is that students are overload with subjects. Without even having to go inside a classroom, the ordinary observer can already see this from the oversized bags that students have to lug everyday, filled with books and other learning materialsOne consequence is that the ordinary school day leaves our kids exhausted, with shortsighted time for play and affectionateizing at school. This leads to the exclusion of learning social skills which is an essential part of growing up.The main objection of parents against the K-12 is more scotch than anything else. Parents fear the extra years will result in more expenses to be shouldered. They miss the point about the proposed curriculum leading to alter learning for their children.Dean Jorge Bocobo saysESPLENIA I also realized that indeed principle IS NOT FILLING UP THE PAIL, IT IS ABOUT LIGHTING THE FIRE. Blatantly sure indeedwe should not see out students to be blank sheets, who are in competent of thinkin g for themselves. My teaching career was and is a continuing humble experience. Our students are geniuses in their own rights, and as educators we should be able to blame on these hidden gifts of theirs. Which brings me to the point of my discussion, will this philosophy that teaching is not merely filling up the pail, rather it is lighting up the firing off be heightened or diminished by what is now called the K to 12 program of the Philippine Educational System?CHAWEE Another point to deliberate is that children of this generation, this NEW generation, more specifically, get easily bored. They have shorter attention cut across and will most likely display their boredom and discontent more obviously. So will they be able to bear and cope with the additional years in school? I am also concerned on the preparedness in general with regards to the implementation of this program. Although the program was ground on foreign research and was seen to be successful in dissimilarcountr ies, but are we certain that this curriculum will be variable to the Filipino learners, and are the teachers ready to adapt yet again another curriculumbelieving that this could be the solution to our deteriorating educational system.JOEL believing that this could be the solution to our deteriorating educational system. Are the teachers well-informed about the program? Do they have enough training, seminar-workshops and the likes? Have there been researches on the effects of the K-12 program in the Philippine classroom setting?Many critics are quiet bothered that K-12 might be more disastrous than helpful if the musical passage is not velvety. As sighted by one of the professors from the University of the Philippines-Diliman, integrating K-12 to the educational system is like overhauling the whole system and it obviously require openhanded time to bring about. Ironically, DepEd keeps reassuring that the time is ample and they will do it gradually. Then if it is true, why was it that most if not all of the kindergarten teachers who underwent the 2-day training for the vernal kindergarten curriculum have lots of uncertainties in understanding it? In essence, the teachers are the ones who will transmit the program to the students but if they are less capable and less qualified then it may turn ineffectual and forsake of time.CHAWEE Amor Cielo says My take on the K+12, although the purpose or the intention of the proponents of this additional school year in the Philippine educational system is utterly everyone parents dream for their kids to give them the quality of education at par with the world-wide standards, I feel that it is not ideal in our current educational set-up. I deem that before we must be able to successfully attain the global standards that we are aiming for, the government should first face up at the current logistics involving the educational system. The bonding should be first address which has dogged been a problem ever since.Two o f my maids from Mindoro experienced the following * classroom shortage my maid can attest that in Mindoro there are classes held under the tree. * Book Shortage in their school those who are in lower section has a ratio of 17 usage. *PC usage only those in the first section has a chance to use the computers. * Teachers low salary Teaching is regarded as a formal profession they should given proper respect and just compensation / benefits cod to them. * Teacher to student ratio 45 to 50 students or more in one classroom. * Lack of basic facilities necessitate to provide full learning environment clean comfort rooms, laboratories, libraries, gymnasium, drinking fountain for swallow water, clinic).JOEL another important thing to consider is that* Parents have to shell out more money (for transportation and food) for the education of their children. * The government does not have the money to pay for two more years of free education, since it does not even have the money too fully support todays ten years. DepEd must first solve the lack of classrooms, piece of furniture and equipment, qualified teachers, and error-free textbooks. * We can do in ten years what everyone else in the world takes 12 years to do. Why do we have to follow what the rest of the world is doing? Filipinos right now are accepted in prestigious graduate schools in the world, even with only ten years of basic education. * As far as the curriculum is concerned, DepEd should fix the current subjects instead of adding new ones.The problem is the content, not the length, of basic education. As an column put it, we need to have better education, not more education. * A high school diploma will not get anybody anywhere, because personal credit line firms will not hire fresh high school graduates. * bit students are stuck in Grades 11 and 12, colleges and universities will have no freshmen for two years. This will spell financial disaster for many private high Education Institutions ( HEIs). * The drop-out rate will increase because of the two extra years. to a greater extent fundamentally adding two more school years would only infuriate the situation. * While public education is free, a political youth assemblage estimates that a student would still need an average of P20,000 per school year to cover transportation, food, school supplies and other schooling expenses. * Also, based on the current Family Income and Expenditure Survey, families prioritize spending for food and other basic needs over their childrens school needs. Two more years for basic education would inevitably translate to higher dropout rate. * Former Education monument Mona Valisno stated in a separated studythat DepEd needs at least P100 billion to fully address the shortage of 93,599 classrooms and 134,400 seats and P63 one thousand thousand for textbooks and scholarshipsESPLENIA Objectively, the program is good. But the important thing is what does the public say. Hindrances and opposin g minds are there. additional years means additional expenses Thus, an extra effort of explaining is needed as our DepEd secretary brother Luistro Armin explained, let us not look at it as expenses but rather more of an investment. traditionally poor families have their children worked right after high school.On the brighter side, k-12 envisions that graduates of senior high school are equipped with skills to get better job opportunities even if they would not pursue college which means a better income for the family.K-12 is not a perfective tense program though through years of implementation DepEd were open for criticisms and suggestions. Since, one of its biggest problems is the resources. Lack of classrooms, teachers, textbooks and other materials yet budget in education increases still it is not enough but, arising the spirit of unity. This is not just Deped program or brother Luistros but instead it is a Filipino program for the Filipinos. Positively, if the people see that i t is viable, help from LGUs and private sectors will pour in.JOEL score speaks itself that we had gone through BRIDGE, BEC, SEC and many changes in our curriculum. Hope this would be the last we are unique and adaptable to any kind environment. We Filipinos are survivors. As they say, bahala na lets just cross the twain when we get there. Prepared byJoel A. RazIn conclusion, let me say that the K to 12 program does not only affect DepEd teachers and personnelit affects EVERYBODY. But as we all know, we are prisoners and we cannot question the authorities we have croak victims of the circumstances. However, I realized that regardless of whatever program is being implemented by the government, or DepEd, or CHED for that matter, what matters is the dedication of the teachers. How are we willing to go farther and further and give it all weve got, even if theres nothingleft of us to give? It is not a question of how good is the program it is a question of how are the teachers willing to set the call of fidelity to the noblest profession.