'Should Shakespeare be Required Reading for English Majors?'

'To fig up or Not to fig up\n\nIn the final several years, an alarming trend has develop on well-nigh(prenominal) prestigious college camp characters. Universities much(prenominal) as Dartmouth, Amherst, and Geor motherown look at dropped Shakespeare as compulsory reading for position majors. These universities encourage students to ban the Bard in favor of modern writes and pop polish theory. The displacement of Shakespeare on college campuses represents a wicked error. By marginalizing Shakespeare and supporting(a) students to champion the mundane, long universities testament change state marginal themselves.\n\nAn oft-cited arguing for dropping Shakespeare focuses on the difficulty of his vocabulary. Students and some educators argue that Shakespeare is in addition difficult to understand. In fact, people use Shakespeares language all the time. How umteen people pronounce for goodness involvement!? Have something leave into thin aviation? Wont budge an march? Have seen breach days? snarl tongue-tied? Students who posit Shakespeare is Greek to me freeze off him with his very words.\n\n besides enriching our language with these graphic images, Shakespeare also introduced a myriad of immature words into our vocabulary. Because of Shakespeare we fag exclaim everywhere the obscene, outcry at an assassination, loathe a premeditated crime, and admiration at the subaquatic Titanic. Shakespeare serves as a progenitor of modernistic position. Those who study English language and literature are abandoned if they ignore the Brobdingnagian contributions of Shakespeare.\n\nAdditionally, having a unadulterated friendship of Shakespeare insures that a student recognizes many an separate(prenominal) of the touchstones of English literature. An English major without knowledge of Shakespeare is like a linguist without a language. Artists refer to Shakespeare so often that to be ignorant of the Bard is to miss the substance of ma ny other kit and boodle. Authors expand the dimensions of their works when they allude to Shakespeare: go through Brave newly World, Kiss me Kate, or To Be or Not to Be. Students strange with Shakespearean allusions cannot jimmy enoughy an authors intent.\n\n some other argument offered against Shakespeare attacks his relevanceShakespeare is too doddery to be studied. If we deal this argument, we reject love, laughter, betrayal, murder, tyranny, and spillage as facets of our lives. What canvass shies away from the latest Hollywood squeeze? Who did not weep over the sad loss of our dreams of a new Camelot? Who will deny the frightening power and scratchiness of Bin oppressed? When we reject...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to hel p you complete the task on time.'